| |
Heather Burnett
Heather Burnett’s work examines the iconography of war and the
representation of violence in the mass media and entertainment industries.
Her interest in such issues stems from her own experiences of war as a
visitor in Bosnia as well as from encounters with political journalists
who have documented events in global war zones. Her video Witness: AnAesthetic,
combines real footage filmed in Sierra Leone by the award-winning journalist
Sorious Samura, with clips taken from violent Hollywood movies. It deals
with the human passage from innocence to murder via mediated events as
well as documentary reality. At the same time, it is a poignant comment
on the aestheticisation of violence in the entertainment industry, the
increasing conflation of fact and fiction in the media, and the various
– often diametrically opposed – standard mechanisms of representation
of violence, ranging from the iconic to the banal; as well as our increasing
apathy or numbness in the face of suffering caused in large effect by
these standardized methods.
 |
 |
AnAesthetic, 2001 / DVD, 3" / Courtesy the artist
Writings for Witness:AnAesthetic by Heather
Burnett
Central idea: To view something is a passive phenomenon, one in which
disconnection, disassociation can easily occur. To witness on the other
hand, carries with it the implication of testimony, the possibility of
responding, of responsibility. It also implies the testimony of an individual
witness, not the politics or pressure of a group consensus.
We in the comfortable, safe ‘West’ spend vast amounts of money
to watch images of fabricated violence, while at the same time the real
violence is escalating horribly across the world. One of the many reasons
this insanity is occurring is that censorship bodies prohibit us from
truly witnessing what is happening in reality in the world in the 21st
century. We are deemed somehow ‘too sensitive’ to watch images
of the brutality that is actually happening in our world. This is another
insanity. As the award winning journalist Sorious Somoura has said ‘how
can we be too sensitive to watch these images, when we have freedom and
the ability to turn away, to do something about it, to respond, whereas
those that are actually suffering do not have that chance, that freedom’.
How can we be ‘too sensitive’ to watch it, when we have such
an appetite for images of false violence, that they fill our screens,
at home, and in the cinema. Movie violence normalises our perception and
acceptance of real violence only if we cannot compare it to images of
the real thing.
 |
 |
AnAesthetic, 2001 / DVD, 3" / Courtesy the artist
The tyranny of format (exerpt of the text)
Films
The media employ heavily framed formats, in particular for representations
of violence, whether fictional or real. In films, no matter how realistic
the violence may seem, there is absolutely no connection whatsoever to
the horror of real violence. This is underlined by the use of charismatic
actors, dramatic narrative music, happy ‘meaningful’ endings,
big explosions and exciting gun sounds, and the increasingly glamorous
manner in which the violence is presented . In a film, bombs may fall,
people may be shot and die, but you don’t have to watch the unbearable
spectacle of real people burning alive, bleeding to death, screaming in
horror, living and dying in great pain. You may watch, for your enjoyment,
a known actor writhing about ‘dying’ but you know that he
will get up at the end of the take and go home. Movie violence normalises
our acceptance of the reality and inevitability of real violence, because
it seduces us into finding it beautiful. It seduces us into finding it
meaningful. The subconscious message is: violence is fun, violence is
ok, it has meaning , it is survivable, it is normal. We pay for the privilege
of this subversive indoctrination.
Real violence sounds, looks and feels terrible, it is truly horrifying.
No words can approach what it is to really experience or see violence.
It is simply unbearable to watch, unbearable to conceive of, difficult
to respond to, confusing, demoralising and challenging. There are no happy
endings. There is no dramatic music, no deeper meaning, no glamorous Tom
Cruise or George Clooney killing or dying for their country/god/beliefs/woman
etc. There is only the harsh sight of a fellow human suffering needlessly,
meaninglessly.
 |
 |
AnAesthetic, 2001 / DVD, 3" / Courtesy the artist
www.burnett-rose.com
|
|